Categorie
Browse History
	
	
| 
				 Processing Scenario  | 
			
				 Traditional Manual Calibration Method  | 
			
				 Laser Collimation Coaxial Instrument  | 
		
| 
				 Calibration Accuracy  | 
			
				 ≥0.3mm  | 
			
				 ≤0.08mm  | 
		
| 
				 Calibration Efficiency  | 
			
				 Low, relying on experience, requiring multiple dotting, observation, and debugging on the strip, time - consuming  | 
			
				 High, 3 steps to complete the whole - process calibration, and it can be completed in more than 1 minute  | 
		
| 
				 Yield Performance  | 
			
				 The success rate of coaxiality is only about 85%  | 
			
				 The success rate of coaxiality is 100%  | 
		
| 
				 Operation Difficulty  | 
			
				 High, requiring high experience for debugging personnel  | 
			
				 Low, the whole process is visualized, and newbies can get started quickly  | 
		
| 
				 Safety  | 
			
				 There is a laser safety risk. Laser is emitted during debugging, which may damage eyes  | 
			
				 No laser safety risk, no laser emission required during debugging  | 
		
| 
				 Equipment Adaptability  | 
			
				 Poor, the equipment is heavy and complex, and it is difficult to flexibly adapt to multiple devices  | 
			
				 Good, portable design, can flexibly adapt to multiple devices  | 
		
| 
				 Intelligent Degree  | 
			
				 Low, lack of self - diagnosis system  | 
			
				 AI  | 
		
	
